|
Allotments as ecological assets Surveys by local authorities show that allotments (even fully operational ones) can provide valuable wildlife habitats, such as foraging and nesting areas. They contribute to green corridors running through urban areas. Sensitive management of allotment sites could ensure that wildlife habitats are encouraged |
|
Memorandum by the Local Government Association, 1998 |
The QED Allotment Group in the document Making Biodiversity Happen (1998) stated that:
|
allotment sites have on average up to 30% higher biodiversity than urban parks, and hence are ecologically more important. |
The Tilehurst Poors Allotment land has been an open space for at least 200 years and has developed a range of flora and fauna that reflects this. Although some sections have been cultivated, others have fallen into disuse presenting opportunities for wildlife to flourish undisturbed. The construction of 61 dwellings will put pressure on the habitats outside the development zone resulting in a decrease in the areas value to wildlife.
(See
list of flora
and fauna
and map
references A,B,C)
Habitats
present
In 1998 Dr Neil Gale identified a rare plant, Babingtons poppy, on site C.
The site is part of a green link between McIlroy Park, Gypsy Lane and Arthur Newbery Park. Green links are relatively continuous areas of green space joining areas of similar habitat through the built environment. They are formed by the combination of parks, open spaces, playing fields, railway cuttings and embankments, footpaths, even tree-lined roads and roadside verges. Green links may not be areas of high nature conservation value themselves, but provide a corridor between such areas to form a network of sites. (freely quoted from Friends of the Earth publication Planning for the Planet). Readings Local Plan policy NE 3 refers to those already identified and the Council will seek opportunities to consolidate, extend and enhance the network.
When the West Reading Woodlands Plan survey was carried out in 1997/98 by Henrietta Westergaard this site was not included. The first map in the final report shows this site as a substantial area of open space surrounded by Blundells Copse, McIlroy Park, Arthur Newbery Park and Lousehill Park. It should be the subject of a detailed survey for flora and fauna before any important decisions are made involving alteration of use.
The Landscape and Ecology Report presented by Wimpey Homes is totally inadequate in this respect. Section 4.2 and 4.3 admit that the fieldwork was carried out in December, hardly the best time for vegetation, breeding birds or reptiles. No habitats were mapped or described and no target notes given only casual records of flora and fauna were made. This falls well short of a Phase 1 habitat survey, the minimum required for this level of development. The badger survey did not attempt to penetrate the dense bramble scrub adjacent to Armour Hill or to look at the land owned by the Scout Group. If it had, the presence of other setts would have been apparent. Although currently occupied by a fox, the one on land proposed for the housing in Armour Hill could well be re-occupied in the future. As a result, the picture presented of the current use of the site by the badger clan is incomplete and the mitigation suggested is therefore insufficient. A single 1m wide corridor along the edge of the site and not following existing routes is not sufficient. The report admits that the entire allotment area displays well-worn badger paths and snuffle holes then suggests confining the badgers to fenced-off section with a single narrow track out. This may look neat on a plan, but is hardly adequate to safeguard the future of this badger clan.
Appendix 3 gives a preliminary list of flora and fauna. This is by no means comprehensive as access to large sections of the area is now prohibited. Reference to this list will show that a number of protected and scheduled species are present. Besides the badgers, protected by the Protection of Badgers Act 1992, slow-worm, grass snake, at least three bat species and stag beetle have been recorded. All these species receive protection under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 and Subsequent Amendments. In the Protected Species section of PPG 9 Nature Conservation, paragraph 47 states
|
that the presence of a protected species is a material consideration when a local planning authority in considering a development proposal which, if carried out, would be likely to result in harm to the species or its habitat. |
There is a wide variety of garden and woodland birds including song thrush, a National Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP) and Red Data Book species. Proposals for extensive housing will inevitably result in loss of breeding and foraging resources for all these animals.
The local BAP draft list includes bluebell, stag beetle, song thrush, nightingale, grass snake, pipistrelle and noctule bats all of which have been recorded from the allotment site. These animals and plants all have Action Plans for their protection and some have activities designed to enhance and extend their habitats.
The local policy NE 5: TREES, HEDGES AND WOODLANDS is relevant:
|
The Borough Council will seek to protect individual trees, groups of trees, hedges and woodlands from damage or removal and will encourage the extension of the Boroughs vegetation cover. |
There is a range of trees, and important hedges along Armour Hill and Kentwood Hill that also merit assessment. A list of plants has already been made and the hedges appear to have been present for at least 200 years making them even more important as established habitat.